Adelaide university annual review of progress năm 2024

Each year, the HCDE faculty reviews all PhD students actively enrolled in the HCDE PhD program. Each PhD student provides summary information concerning progress-­to-­date in the PhD program. All faculty review the summary documents in order to (a) identify opportunities to mentor individual students and (b) monitor the health of the PhD program overall. Faculty pay particular attention to senior students (in order to support their completion), first year students (in order to support their success), and students who have encountered challenges. The goal is for all students to benefit from participating in the annual review process.

Instructions

Each student will be required to submit the following three documents to the Annual Review 2023 Google Form by the end of the third week of spring quarter each year. Documents should be saved as PDFs using last name_document. Documents cannot be submitted as zip files.

1. Responses to the annual review questions.
2. A current CV with activities from the most recent year highlighted in yellow.
3. An updated and signed course of study form. Links provided below.
4. An overview slide of high level updates and asks for faculty (see )
5. Doctoral advisory or committee form (optional)

In addition, students seeking funding from the department for the next academic year will be required to complete an additional form, details to come.

Annual Review Questions

Looking back:

• What are your current research interests (~100 words)?
• What were your major activities/accomplishments/areas of growth during the past year?
• What is something this year that you are particularly proud of? You might choose to highlight an item from the previous question or draw attention to something that might otherwise be more invisible.
• What progress have you made toward completing your course-of-study requirements, and what is still pending? Did you collect your faculty advisor's/mentor's signature on the form? Are there any courses you have completed from outside of HCDE that were meaningful (specifically any theory or methods electives)?
• Is there additional information the faculty should know that is relevant to your progress through the program? You might want to include a challenge you did not anticipate, hardships you’ve encountered, and/or anything else that provides us with an understanding of your progress.

Looking ahead:

• What are your current thoughts about your career goal? Example responses could include ideas such as: I want a faculty position/position in a research lab, I am leaning toward x, I thought I knew but am currently unsure now, I definitely want a faculty position at an xx institution, etc.What are your current thoughts about your career goal?
• What role(s) do you imagine teaching playing in your future career? Example responses might include: I am hoping for a faculty position in which teaching would be a component, I’d like a teaching-focused position, I plan to go to industry and thus my future teaching activity would probably be more informal, I’d like to be a consultant who occasionally offers workshops. How might you prepare for such role(s) during the upcoming year?
• What do you plan to do/ hope to do next year?
• What kind of questions would you like the faculty/department to answer and/or what kind of support would you like to gain following this annual review? The following offers examples/inspiration: (a) “Given my career goals, how do you recommend I strengthen my qualifications over the next year?” (b) “I am struggling with x (e.g., time management, uncertainty). How can I get advice/support on addressing this?” ­­and (c) “I wish there were more opportunities for x (e.g., teaching, mentoring, writing feedback, presenting my work).” ­

Additional Information

Who participates?

The annual review is a process that involves all the department’s PhD students and tenure-line faculty.

Students

All students who have been admitted to the PhD program but have not yet successfully defended a dissertation will participate in the annual review every year. Students who are officially on leave from UW in the winter quarter may be excused from the annual review for one year; a student may not be excused from the review process for more than one year while in the program. If a student does not participate in the required annual review process, they will not be eligible to register for classes in subsequent quarters until they have met the participation requirements.

Faculty

The review committee will include all tenure-line faculty members in HCDE with the exception of those faculty members who are on sabbatical leave or are otherwise formally excused by the Chair of HCDE.

What is the schedule?

The general timeline for the annual review process is shown in the table below.

Date

Action

No later than the second week of spring quarter

All PhD students submit a completed Annual Review Form, a current CV with activities from the recent year highlighted in yellow, and an updated and signed course of study form to the Director of Academic Services.

On/before the ninth week of spring quarter Review committee sends individual review letters to all PhD students. Second week of fall quarter PhD students who receive a less than satisfactory rating in spring quarter submit an updated Annual Review Form and a cover letter explaining what they are doing to improve their performance in the program. Fourth week of fall quarter Review committee sends individual review letters to all PhD students who were required to participate in this mid-year review process.

What are the potential outcomes of the annual review?

After the review committee has met, it will assign all students a rating of progress. Those ratings and associated requirements are shown in the table below.

What is the major review for Phd Adelaide?

The primary purpose of the major review is to assess your progress against both the quality and quantity of work required for completion of your degree within the required timeframe (namely, your capacity to achieve thesis submission within three to three and a half years if you are a doctoral candidate, or, eighteen ...

What is the annual review of a Phd?

The purpose of the annual review is to: consider your academic progress. confirm satisfactory completion of research training. confirm that you have discussed the ethical implications of your research with your supervisor.

What you will need to complete the CCSP?

Candidates must have a minimum of five years cumulative, full-time experience in information technology. Three years must be in information security, and one year must be in one or more of the six domains of the current CCSP Exam Outline.

What is a Phd milestone?

Milestones are dates by which you plan to complete parts of your research, thesis and studies. Establish your own milestones and keep a record of them. Discuss them with your Research Progress Panels (RPPs) because they have experience of the time required to complete parts of research projects.