Which of the following points was a characteristic of the young turk movement?
|
This is a preview. Log in to get access Show Abstract The article takes issue with two hypotheses often claimed in the literature--that the Ottoman centuries extending from the sixteenth to the nineteenth evince a progressive development from a centralized to a quasi-feudal polity, and that during the course of the nineteenth century progress had been made toward a constitutional government. It is noted that throughout the period in question, in fact, two types of relationship existed between the center and the periphery: power politics and a degenerated form of patronclient relationship. The change that took place has been no more than a segregative change. Change in the periphery itself was not evolutionary, let alone revolutionary. At times it showed signs of involution; any weakening of the central control led to maximum legal irresponsibility. /// Cet article remet en question deux hypothèses souvent soutenues dans la littérature, à savoir que l'Empire ottoman, du seizième siècle au dix-neuvième siècle, évolue progressivement d'un système politique centralisé à une organisation quasi féodale et que, durant le dix-neuvième siècle, on assiste à des progrès en direction d'un régime constitutionnel. En fait, on constate que, tout au long de la période mentionnée, deux types de relation ont existé entre le centre et la périphérie: une politique de confrontation et une forme dégénérée de relation du genre client-patron. Les changements qui eurent lieu ne furent rien d'autre que des changements d'isolement. Les changements en périphérie ne furent pas évolutifs et certainement pas révolutionnaires. A certains moments des signes d'involution apparaissent même: tout affaiblissement du contrôle central entraîne une irresponsabilité légale accrue. Journal Information The International Political Science Review (IPSR) is the quarterly journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA). It is committed to publishing material that makes a significant contribution to international political science. It seeks to meet the needs of political scientists throughout the world who are interested in studying political phenomena in the contemporary context of increasing international interdependence and global change. The IPSR reflects the aims and intellectual tradition of its parent body, IPSA: to foster the creation and dissemination of rigorous political inquiry free of subdisciplinary or other orthodoxy. Publisher Information SAGE Publications is an academic and professional publisher. We publish books, journals and software under the SAGE, Corwin Press, Paul Chapman Publishing, Pine Forge Press, SAGE Reference, SAGE Science and Scolari (US and Europe websites) imprints. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. This is a preview. Log in to get access Journal Information The International Journal of Middle East Studies publishes original research on politics, society and culture in the Middle East from the seventh century to the present day. The journal also covers Spain, south-east Europe, and parts of Africa, South Asia, and the former Soviet Union for subjects of relevance to Middle Eastern civilization. Particular attention is paid to the history, politics, economics, anthropology, sociology, literature, and cultural studies of the area and to comparative religion, theology, law, and philosophy. Each issue contains approximately 50 pages of detailed book reviews. Subscribers to the print version also receive the MESA Bulletin free. Guidelines for Contributors at Cambridge Journals Online Publisher Information Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
Which of the following was a characteristic feature of the Young Turk movement quizlet?Which of the following was a characteristic feature of the Young Turk movement? It supported the transformation of the Ottoman Empire into a Turkish national state.
What was the aim of Young Turk movement?Young Turks (Turkish: Jön Türkler or Genç Türkler) was a political reform movement in the early 20th century that favored the replacement of the Ottoman Empire's absolute monarchy with a constitutional government. They led a rebellion against the absolute rule of Sultan Abdulhamid II in the 1908 Young Turk Revolution.
Which of the following reforms occurred when the Young Turks were in power?Which of the following policies did the Young Turks implement once in power following the 1908 military coup? They instituted elections and permitted competing political parties.
Who were the Young Turks quizlet?movement formed in the 1890s by a group of liberals, insisted that reform was the only way to save the empire. were determined to restore the 1876 constitution and resume far reaching reforms within the empire.
|
