Prisoners may not be used to conduct research that only benefits the larger society
Original Alphabetical Show
Realization that ethical abuses are not limited to the Nazi regime Prisoners may be used to conduct research that only benefits the larger society US Public Health Service Policy (45 CFR 46 raised to regulatory status
the US Public Health Service policy of 1966 "Clinical research and investigation involving human beings".) Death of Jesse Gelsinger (Although all of these are related to the …show more content…IRB continuing review of an approved protocol must: Occur at least annually. Give the subject comprehensive information about the new drug, including its side effects. Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and
the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug. I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research.
The University of Pittsburgh IRB adheres to the regulatory requirements for research which involves a prisoner as outlined in 45 CFR 46 Subpart C. DefinitionsPrisoner - A prisoner is defined as “an individual involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution” and encompasses individuals sentenced to such an institution under criminal or civil statute, individuals detained in other facilities by virtue of statutes or commitment procedures which provide alternatives to criminal prosecution or incarceration in a penal institution, and individuals detained pending arraignment, trial, or sentencing. Prisoner Representative - An individual who is currently or formerly a prisoner or an individual who has a close working knowledge, understanding and appreciation of prison conditions from the perspective of the prisoner (e.g., prison chaplain, prison social worker, prison health care worker.) Minimal Risk - For research involving prisoners, the IRB will use the following definition for "minimal risk": "Minimal risk is the probability and magnitude of physical or psychological harm that is normally encountered in the daily lives, or in the routine medical, dental, or psychological examination of healthy persons (emphasis added)." Regulatory RequirementsResearch involving prisoners that is federally funded or which is conducted in a federal prison will be reviewed by a convened IRB committee which includes at least one member who is a prisoner or a prisoner representative with appropriate background and experience to serve in that capacity. All other studies involving prisoners will include a prisoner representative as a consultant. This includes initial review, continuing review, full-board modifications, and reportable unexpected or unanticipated problems.
The IRB will approve the research only if it finds and documents that:
Note: An IRB finding that follow-up examination or care of the prisoner-subjects may be needed after the end of their study participation will necessitate a change in the standard Compensation for Injury section of the informed consent document. The change will need to address the provision of long-term care for this subject population and must be prior approved by legal counsel to the IRB. If a study utilizing prisoners as research participants is federally funded, the HRP Director or designee will follow the process to submit the electronic certification to the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) indicating it has approved a study that will include prisoners, the category the study fits into as well as how the study satisfies the six criteria noted under the regulations. A research study is not permitted to commence for DHHS supported research until written approval is received from OHRP on behalf of the DHHS Secretary under the provisions of 45 CFR 46.306(a)(2). If a participant becomes a prisoner while enrolled in a research study that was not reviewed according to Subpart C, the IRB will:
Research Conducted in Pennsylvania State Department of CorrectionsIn Pennsylvania, the Department of Corrections has issued Policy Statement 2.1.2 which effectively bans the use of state prisoners in any medical experiments, cosmetic experiments, or pharmaceutical testing, with the exception for some testing involving treatment for AIDS and HIV infection. If a study utilizes prisoners from a state prison in Pennsylvania, approval from the Research Review Committee of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections is required. Research Conducted in the Federal Bureau of PrisonsThe Federal Bureau of Prisons has adopted extensive regulations for researchers seeking to use federal prisoners as research subjects. Among other things, these regulations prohibit use of prisoners within federal facilities for “medical experimentation, cosmetic research, or pharmaceutical testing.” 28 C.F.R. 512.11(a)(3). In addition, strict limitations are imposed on incentives to prisoner/participants, and researchers may not promise confidentiality to subjects who reveal a future intent to engage in criminal behavior. For additional requirements related to the Department of Justice regulations, see Chapter 26. Which example of research with prisoners would be allowable?Which example of research with prisoners would be allowable under the regulations? Examining age at first arrest as a predictor of adult criminal history. Examining age at first arrest is the correct answer.
Which of the following is a rule that researchers must follow when using deception in their research?Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...
When reviewing federally supported research involving prisoners an IRB must have which of the following?IRB review must include a prisoner or prisoner representative (45 CFR 46.304(b) and if the study is reviewed by a full board, the convened meeting must also meet a membership requirement concerning the number of IRB members not associated with a prison/jail involved in the research (45 CFR 46.304(a).
What was the result of the Beecher article?An article by Beecher's in 1966 on unethical medical experimentation in the New England Journal of Medicine — "Ethics and Clinical Research" — was instrumental in the implementation of federal rules on human experimentation and informed consent.
|