Why was the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v Federal elections Commission significant quizlet?
|
 Show
Upgrade to remove ads Only SGD 41.99/year
Civil Liberties Terms in this set (38)Chaplinksy v. New Hampshire (1942) Supreme Court case that decided that "fighting words" are not protected by the First Amendment. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Supreme Court case that decided that the part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law that prevents corporations and labor unions from spending money on advertisements independent of political candidates or parties is unconstitutional. clear-and-present-danger test Law should not punish speech unless there was a clear and present danger of producing harmful actions. due process of law Denies the government the right to deprive people of life, liberty, and property. Engel v. Vitale (1962) Supreme Court case that decided that there may not be prayer, even nondenominational ones, in public schools. equal protection of the law A standard of equal treatment that must be observed by the government. establishment clause First Amendment ban on laws "respecting an establishment of religion." Everson v. Board of Education (1947) Supreme Court case that decided that announced the wall-of-separation principle. exclusionary rule Improperly gathered evidence may not be introduced in criminal trials. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007) Supreme Court case that prohibited campaign finance reform law from banning political advocacy. free-exercise clause First Amendment requirement that law cannot prevent free exercise of religion. freedom of expression Right of people to speak, publish, and assemble. freedom of religion People shall be free to exercise their religion and government may not establish a religion. Gitlow v. New York (1925) Supreme Court case that decided that the First Amendment applies to states. good-faith exception An error in gathering evidence sufficiently minor that it may be used in a trial. Inevitable discovery The police can use evidence if it would have been found anyway. Lee v. Weisman (1992) Supreme Court case that decided the public schools may not have clergy lead prayers at graduation ceremonies. Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Supreme Court case that described three tests for deciding whether the government is improperly involved with religion. libel Writing that falsely injures another person. McDonald v. Chicago (2010) Supreme Court case that decided that the Second Amendment applies to the state governments as well as the federal one. Miller v. California (1973) Supreme Court case that defined obscenity as appealing to prurient interests of an average person with materials that lack literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Supreme Court case that decided to libel a public figure, there must be "actual malice." Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Supreme Court case that decided that states must observe all "fundamental" liberties. Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) Supreme Court case that decided that though states may require public education, they may not require that students attend only public schools. prior restraint Censorship of a publication. probable cause Reasonable cause for issuing a search warrant or making an arrest; more than mere suspicion. Public safety exception The police can question an un-Mirandized suspect if there is an urgent concern for public safety. Reno v. ACLU (1997) Supreme Court case that decided that a law that bans sending "indecent" material to minors over the Internet is unconstitutional because "indecent" is to vague and broad a term. Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000) Supreme Court case that decided that students may not lead prayers before the start of a football game at a public school. Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case that decided that speech may be punished if it creates a clear-and-present-danger of illegal acts. search warrant A judge's order authorizing a search. selective incorporation The process whereby the Court has applied many parts of the Bill of Rights to the states. symbolic speech An act that conveys a political message. Texas v. Johnson (1989) Supreme Court case that decided that there may not be a law to ban flag-burning. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) Supreme Court case that decided that public-school students may wear armbands to class protesting against America's war in Vietnam when such display does not disrupt classes. wall of separation Court ruling that government cannot be involved with religion. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Supreme Court case that upheld voucher plan to pay school bills. Zorauch v. Clauson (1952) Supreme Court case that decided that states may allow students to be released from public schools to attend religious instruction. Recommended textbook solutionsMagruder's American Government1st EditionSavvas Learning Co 555 solutions Magruder's American Government1st EditionDaniel M. Shea 602 solutions Magruder's American Government, Florida Student Edition1st EditionDaniel M. Shea 602 solutions
Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry 269 solutions Sets with similar termsChapters 13-1492 terms aalesh4577 Mgmt Exam 1 CASES54 terms kendallmdean AP GOV Landmark Supreme Court Cases39 terms Beencaleb POL: Exam 3 Jeopardy55 terms mr10411 Sets found in the same folderAP Government Chapter 1114 terms kt0308 AP Government Chapter 1912 terms kt0308 AP Government Chapter 2016 terms kt0308 AP Government Chapter 216 terms kt0308 Other sets by this creatorMath 330 Midterm11 terms kt0308 POL 210 Final22 terms kt0308 Chapter 7130 terms kt0308 Chapter 6162 terms kt0308 Verified questions
US GOVERNMENT How did the Framers plan to resolve conflicts that might arise between the states and the national government? Verified answer
US GOVERNMENT Analyze the economic impact of major events , including World War II, on the history of Texas. Write a paragraph analyzing how the war transformed Texas's economy. Consider such factors as: federal funding; the elimination of the state debt; increasing diversity within the Texan economy. How did World War II change the eco nomy of Texas? Verified answer
US GOVERNMENT Do you think it should be easier to amend the Constitution today? Explain your answer. Verified answer
US GOVERNMENT a. Why were farmers in Massachusetts angry enough to join Shays's Rebellion? b. How did leaders like George Washington react to Shays's Rebellion? c. What was the eventual outcome of the rebellion and how did it affect the national Congress? Verified answer Other Quizlet setsMrs. Fraser DES Science Ch 5 and 634 terms Graham8401 SANT/FALSKT tentor30 terms mysmatilda Developmental Psych Chapter 145 terms norrisll SIE227 terms clayton_renitaTEACHER Related questionsQUESTION Why do Presidential powers tend to grow during national emergencies? 15 answers QUESTION What is a direct result of governments concern about the general welfare of its citizens 13 answers QUESTION What do critics of the responsible party model claim? 5 answers QUESTION Which characteristic of the House of Representatives was NOT intentionally designed to make it more "democratic," in comparison to the Senate? 4 answers Why was the Citizens United case important quizlet?Citizens United disputed the regulation that prohibited corporations and unions from directly paying for advertisements that supported or denounced a specific candidate within 30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election.
What was the importance of the Citizens United Supreme Court judgment in the US?The court's ruling effectively freed corporations and unions to spend money both on "electioneering communications" and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates (although not to contribute directly to candidates or political parties).
What was the primary effect of Citizens United v FEC quizlet?What was the main effect of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? It gave corporations the ability to make unlimited campaign contributions.
What did the US Supreme Court decision Citizens United v Federal Election Commission end up doing?The Court ultimately held in this case that the anti corruption interest is not sufficient to displace the speech in question from Citizens United and that "independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption."
|
