What are the main differences between the structural functionalism theory and conflict theory?

Functionalism and conflict theory are two theories that influence the purposes of schooling. These two theories are both different and similar in their view and relation to schooling. Basically, the differences lie in the way these two theories explain transmission, as well as way functionalists are more accepting and conflict theorists want to change things. The two theories are similar in their views of structure and culture.

"Functionalism...argues that society operates as does the human body: Like living organisms, all societies possess basic functions which they must carry out to survive. Like living organisms, they evolve structures to carry out the functions" (Bennett deMarais and LeCompte, p. 5). Functionalism is a theory that certainly concentrates more on the social aspects and cultural aspects more than any other areas within the schooling systems. Based upon these two aspects, functionalists will try to recognize the social system. From there, functionalists explain how the school systems operate, while at the same time keeping order and equilibrium preserved.

Functionalists focus on intellectual, political, economical, and social purposes as what they perceive as the purposes of schooling. The intellectual purposes of schooling according to functionalists are learning and applying cognitive, substantive, and inquiry skills throughout their childhoods and on into their adulthoods. The functionalist view also states that the political purposes of schooling include educating children to become adults in this world that participate in politics, promote sharing history, encourage immigration, and are people who make sure order and obeying laws come into play. Economically, functionalists feel that schooling prepares children for their careers in life and also to choose and instruct the labor force. Lastly, functionalists believe that the social purposes of schools are to encourage social and moral responsibility, become places for people to solve social problems, and to become another place...

Functionalism and the conflict theory are two perspectives used in Sociology between which some difference can be identified. Sociology is a discipline in the social sciences which studies human society and group behavior in society. In sociology, many perspectives are used to understand human society. Through each perspective, a different approach is used to understand the society. Functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism are the main perspectives. In this article, we will be paying attention to functionalism and conflict theory. Functionalism and Conflict theory use a macro approach in understanding the society. The key difference between functionalism and conflict theory is that, in functionalism, the society is understood as a system consisting of different subsections that have specific functions. On the other hand, the conflict theory comprehends the society through the social conflicts that arise due to the inequality that prevail among different social classes.

What is Functionalism?

As mentioned in the introduction, functionalism views the society as a system that is created of different parts. Each part has a specific function in the society. Let us simplify this. In the society, there are social institutions such as education, religion, family, economy and the political institution. Each institution has a specific function that contributes to the society or else the system. If one becomes dysfunctional, this not only affects that institution but also the very social system as well. This is why some functionalists compare the society to the human body.

Functionalists such as Talcott Parsons specifically emphasize the importance of social order. In every society, it is important to maintain the status quo so that the society can function effectively. When this social order is not maintained, it results in a condition of conflict and disarray in the society. This can occur due to the issues that arise within a particular institution or a number of institutions. For example, in times of social revolutions, the social equilibrium or social order is lost.

Another concept that is stressed by Functionalists is collective consciousness. According to Durkheim, the society is possible due to the consensus among people. This results from the collective consciousness that refers to the common beliefs of the society. These lay the foundation for functionalism.

A statue of Emilie Durkhiem

What is Conflict Theory?

The conflict theory highlights that various groups within the society have different interests that can lead to conflict. There are many branches of conflict theory of which Marxism holds a unique position. Marxism highlights the significance of the economic factor. According to Karl Marx, conflicts in society arise due to inequalities among different social classes.

Another interpretation of conflict theory stems from Max Weber, who highlights that other than the economy, factors such as power and status are also important. As you can see both functionalism and conflict theory presents a point of view in approaching the society. However, there is a difference between the two perspectives. This can be summarized as follows.

Karl Marx

What is the Difference Between Functionalism and Conflict Theory?

Definitions of Functionalism and Conflict Theory:

Functionalism: In functionalism, the society is understood as a system consisting of different subsections that have specific functions.

Conflict Theory: Conflict theory comprehends the society through the social conflicts that arise due to the inequality that prevail among different social classes.

What is the difference between structural functional and social conflict?

What is the largest difference between the functionalist and conflict perspectives?

What is the key difference between conflict theory and the structural functionalist theory of urbanization quizlet?

What is the difference between functionalism and structural functionalism?