If today is Sunday then tomorrow will be Monday inductive or deductive
The first way is that we are exposed to several different examples of a situation, and from those examples, we conclude a general truth. For instance, you visit your local grocery store daily to pick up necessary items. You notice that on Friday, two weeks ago, all the clerks in the store were wearing football jerseys. Again, last Friday, the clerks wore their football jerseys. Today, also a Friday, they’re wearing them again. From just these observations, you can conclude that on all Fridays, these supermarket employees will wear football jerseys to support their local team. Show
This type of pattern recognition, leading to a conclusion, is known as inductive reasoning. Knowledge can also move the opposite direction. Say that you read in the news about a tradition in a local grocery store, where employees wore football jerseys on Fridays to support the home team. This time, you’re starting from the overall rule, and you would expect individual evidence to support this rule. Each time you visited the store on a Friday, you would expect the employees to wear jerseys. Such a case, of starting with the overall statement and then identifying examples that support it, is known as deductive reasoning. The Power of Inductive ReasoningYou have been employing inductive reasoning for a very long time. Inductive reasoning is based on your ability to recognize meaningful patterns and connections. By taking into account both examples and your understanding of how the world works, induction allows you to conclude that something is likely to be true. By using induction, you move from specific data to a generalization that tries to capture what the data “mean.” Imagine that you ate a dish of strawberries and soon afterward your lips swelled. Now imagine that a few weeks later you ate strawberries and soon afterwards your lips again became swollen. The following month, you ate yet another dish of strawberries, and you had the same reaction as formerly. You are aware that swollen lips can be a sign of an allergy to strawberries. Using induction, you conclude that, more likely than not, you are allergic to strawberries. Data: After I ate strawberries, my lips swelled (1st time). Data: After I ate strawberries, my lips swelled (2nd time). Data: After I ate strawberries, my lips swelled (3rd time). Additional Information: Swollen lips after eating strawberries may be a sign of an allergy. Conclusion: Likely I am allergic to strawberries. Inductive reasoning can never lead to absolute certainty. Instead, induction allows you to say that, given the examples provided for support, the claim more likely than not is true. Because of the limitations of inductive reasoning, a conclusion will be more credible if multiple lines of reasoning are presented in its support. The results of inductive thinking can be skewed if relevant data are overlooked. In the previous example, inductive reasoning was used to conclude that I am likely allergic to strawberries after suffering multiple instances of my lips swelling. Would I be as confident in my conclusion if I were eating strawberry shortcake on each of those occasions? Is it reasonable to assume that the allergic reaction might be due to another ingredient besides strawberries? This example illustrates that inductive reasoning must be used with care. When evaluating an inductive argument, consider
Inductive Reasoning Put to WorkA synopsis of the features, benefits, and drawbacks of deductive reasoning can be found in this video. Answers 0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 1K views5 pagesDocument Informationclick to expand document information
llll Original TitleAnswers Copy Copyright© © All Rights Reserved Available FormatsDOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd Share this documentShare or Embed DocumentSharing Options
Did you find this document useful?0%0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Is this content inappropriate?Download now SaveSave Answers Copy For Later 0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) Answers Original Title:Answers Copy Uploaded byAudzkie
llll SaveSave Answers Copy For Later 0%0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful EmbedShare PrintDownload now Jump to Page You are on page 1of 5Search inside document You're Reading a Free Preview Reward Your CuriosityEverything you want to read. Anytime. Anywhere. Any device. No Commitment. Cancel anytime. Share this documentShare or Embed DocumentSharing Options
Home Books Audiobooks Documents Is this an inductive or deductive argument?If the arguer believes that the truth of the premises definitely establishes the truth of the conclusion, then the argument is deductive. If the arguer believes that the truth of the premises provides only good reasons to believe the conclusion is probably true, then the argument is inductive.
What is inductive and deductive example?Inductive Reasoning: Most of our snowstorms come from the north. It's starting to snow. This snowstorm must be coming from the north. Deductive Reasoning: All of our snowstorms come from the north.
What are examples of inductive reasoning?Here are some examples of inductive reasoning: Data: I see fireflies in my backyard every summer. Hypothesis: This summer, I will probably see fireflies in my backyard.
Which statement is the best example of deductive reasoning?With this type of reasoning, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. Logically Sound Deductive Reasoning Examples: All dogs have ears; golden retrievers are dogs, therefore they have ears.
|