Hp 15s du0107tu i5 8265u review năm 2024
|
Core i5 Pavilion. After reviewing the AMD variant of the HP Pavilion 15, we now have the Intel Core i5 version with an NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU in for testing. The design remains the same and is finished to a high quality. Read on to find out what to expect from the Intel variant of the Pavilion 15 and how it compares against its AMD sibling. Show Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Alex Alderson), Published 01/11/2019 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 The HP Pavilion is a familiar device in our offices. We first reviewed the Pavilion 15-cs0053cl, with its Intel Core i5-8250U processor and integrated graphics, which was followed up a few months later with the 15-cw0003ng and its AMD Ryzen 5 2500U APU. Now we have the 15-cs0003ng, which HP has equipped with a Core i5-8250U processor and an NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU. The device also has 8 GB of RAM, a 256 GB SSD and a 1 TB HDD. Display 15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, IPS, glossy: no Mainboard Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH Storage SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, 256 GB , + 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172, 980 GB free Soundcard Conexant CX8400 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller Connections 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combined headphone and microphone jack, Card Reader: SD Networking Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2 Size height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 361 x 245 ( = 0.71 x 14.21 x 9.65 in) Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Camera Webcam: 0.9 MP, 720p, 1,280 x 720 Additional features Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, HP Audio Switch; HP CoolSense; HP JumpStart; McAfee LiveSafe; Netflix, 12 Months Warranty Weight 1.93 kg ( = 68.08 oz / 4.25 pounds), Power Supply: 340 g ( = 11.99 oz / 0.75 pounds) Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. HP has designed the 15-cs0003ng with the same case as it used on the 15-cw0003ng. Please see our review of the 15-cw0003ng here for our full thoughts on the Pavilion 15’s case. Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE DIN A4 382 mm / 15 inch 253 mm / 9.96 inch 21 mm / 0.827 inch 2.2 kg4.83 lbs380 mm / 15 inch 251 mm / 9.88 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.3 kg5.07 lbs379.5 mm / 14.9 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 22.1 mm / 0.87 inch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs361 mm / 14.2 inch 245 mm / 9.65 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.9 kg4.25 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 244 mm / 9.61 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 1.9 kg4.12 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs HP has equipped the Pavilion 15 with a basic selection of ports that should be enough for most users. The inclusion of a USB Type-C port somewhat future proofs the Pavilion though. The device lacks a fingerprint sensor, which HP has been reserving for its Envy and Spectre ranges. HP has equipped our test device with a below average SD card reader, but one which is on par with our comparison devices. The Pavilion 15 averaged around 35 MB/s with our Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC reference card, which is well below its potential maximum speeds. SD cards do not protrude from the edge of the case though, which is a bonus. The cs0003ng supports Bluetooth 4.2 and all Wi-Fi standards up to IEEE 802.11 ac, which means that it can connect to 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi networks. Our test device averaged 277 Mbps in both iperf3 Client tests, which only puts it above its siblings in our comparison tables. In short, the Pavilion 15 has considerably slower Wi-Fi performance than our comparison devices, especially the TravelMate P2510. Networking iperf3 transmit AX12Average of class Multimedia (285 - 1446, n=7, last 2 years) 906 MBit/s +213% Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 620 MBit/s +115% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC 331 (290min - 376max) MBit/s +15% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter 325 MBit/s +12% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 315 MBit/s +9% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 289 (232min - 343max) MBit/s HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 280 MBit/s -3% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 269 MBit/s -7% iperf3 receive AX12Average of class Multimedia (183 - 1675, n=7, last 2 years) 1016 MBit/s +283% Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 513 MBit/s +94% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter 331 MBit/s +25% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 305 MBit/s +15% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 280 MBit/s +6% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC 279 (140min - 285max) MBit/s +5% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 265 (239min - 288max) MBit/s HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 245 MBit/s -8% 020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip HP includes only a 65-W charger in the box. The company does not sell any Pavilion 15 specific accessories either, but it does sell general laptop accessories such as keyboards, mice and speakers among others. The Pavilion 15 does not have a maintenance cover, which would have made it easier to access the HDD, SSD and potentially the RAM. Accessing the internal components requires removing the bottom case, but we did not try doing so with our loaner for fear of damaging the case. The Pavilion 15 comes with 12 months manufacturer’s warranty. The device will also come with statutory warranties and those afforded by third-party sellers such as Amazon. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties article for country-specific information. Our test device has the same keyboard and trackpad as its siblings. Please see our cw0003ng review for our views on the Pavilion 15’s input devices. The Pavilion 15 device has a 15.6-inch IPS screen that runs natively at 1,920x1,080. Our test device achieved an average maximum brightness of 237 cd/m² according to X-Rite i1Pro 2, which puts it below the Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 and the Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB in our comparison table. The display is 90% evenly lit though, which puts it on par with the best of our comparison devices. HP also sells a variant of Pavilion 15 with a 1,366x768 display. Please see our Pavilion 15-cs0053cl review for our thoughts on the lower resolution display. 231 cd/m²222 cd/m²239 cd/m²247 cd/m²240 cd/m²237 cd/m²246 cd/m²237 cd/m²235 cd/m² Distribution of brightness tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 Maximum: 247 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 237.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13.7 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 90 % Center on Battery: 209 cd/m² Contrast: 571:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²) ΔE Color 7.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1 ΔE Greyscale 6.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 54% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 37.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 54.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 36.27% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) Gamma: 2.96 HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng 1920x1080, 15.60Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), , 1920x1080, 15.60Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.60Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Chi Mei CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.60Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 15.60Display 10% 9% 17% 3% Display P3 Coverage 36.27 40.21 11% 39.85 10% 42.27 17% 37.47 3% sRGB Coverage 54.6 59.6 9% 58.8 8% 63.5 16% 56.4 3% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage 37.47 41.54 11% 41.17 10% 43.69 17% 38.71 3% Response Times -12% -5% -2% 21% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * 45 (21, 24) 46 (22.4, 23.6) -2% 44 (21, 23) 2% 40 (23, 17) 11% 41 (22, 19) 9% Response Time Black / White * 28 (16, 12) 34 (15.2, 18.8) -21% 31 (17, 14) -11% 32 (13, 10) -14% 19 (14, 5) 32% PWM Frequency 60 (100) 86000 (90) 25000 (10) 7000 (90) Screen 35% 11% 39% 14% Brightness middle 240 280 17% 283 18% 259 8% 230 -4% Brightness 237 267 13% 252 6% 230 -3% 221 -7% Brightness Distribution 90 85 -6% 75 -17% 82 -9% 91 1% Black Level * 0.42 0.2 52% 0.63 -50% 0.19 55% 0.45 -7% Contrast 571 1400 145% 449 -21% 1363 139% 511 -11% Colorchecker dE 2000 * 7.43 5 33% 4.02 46% 3.13 58% 3.6 52% Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 12.42 7.9 36% 8.77 29% 7.81 37% 5.59 55% Greyscale dE 2000 * 6.26 3.7 41% 0.8 87% 1.42 77% 3.13 50% Gamma 2.96 74% 2.08 106% 2.35 94% 2.36 93% 2.45 90% CCT 6661 98% 7309 89% 6552 99% 6391 102% 7244 90% Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) 35 38.09 9% 38 9% 40 14% 36 3% Color Space (Percent of sRGB) 54 59.26 10% 58 7% 63 17% 56 4% Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * 3.6 4.03 3.09 Total Average (Program / Settings) 11% /24% 5% /9% 18% /29% 13% /12% * ... smaller is better Our test device has a comparatively high 0.42 cd/m² black level, which yields a disappointing 571:1 contrast ratio. By comparison, the Mi Notebook 15.6 and the TravelMate P2510 have considerably higher contrast ratios than the Pavilion 15, so colours will look punchier and more vibrant on those two comparison devices than our test device. Moreover, the 15-cs0003ng achieved lower colour space coverages than our comparison devices. No device is colour accurate enough for even semi-professional image or video editing though. Colours look balanced on our test device, but it has comparatively high DeltaE deviations too. We managed to improve our test device’s colour accuracy by calibrating the display, the ICC profile for which we have included in the box above our comparison table. The 15-cs0003ng is tricky to use outdoors because of its dim display. We can read the display when using our test device outside on cloudy days, but the screen is quickly overwhelmed by reflections when there is any sunshine. Display Response Timesℹ Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise ↘ 12 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise ↘ 24 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.2 ms). Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether. Screen flickering / PWM not detected In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18474 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. Our test device has stable viewing angles though thanks to its IPS display. We noticed no brightness, colour or image distortions even at acute viewing angles, so the 15-cs0003ng should be readable from almost any angle in daily use. The 15-cs0003ng is equipped with an Intel Core i5-8250U processor, 8 GB of RAM, an NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU, a 256 GB SSD and a 1 TB HDD. The combination of hardware makes the device powerful enough for general office tasks and demanding 3D applications. The laptop can even play older games smoothly at medium graphics should you like to unwind with some light gaming. The Core i5-8250U processor is one which we have covered in numerous laptop reviews. The quad-core processor is from Intel’s 8th generation Core series and has a 1.6 GHz base clock speed that can increase to 3.4 GHz when required by utilising Intel Turbo Boost technology. OEMs set the Turbo Boost time according to the effectiveness of a device’s cooling system. We subjected our test device to a looped Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark to determine how well it manages its CPU performance under load. The 15-cs0003ng manages its performance well and maintains around 95% of its peak performance throughout the looped benchmark. The CB15 score drops by approximately 5% after the first benchmark pass through, but the scores remain consistent for the remaining 29 benchmark loops. The Core i5-8250U is initially well beaten in the CB R15 multi-core benchmark by the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U powering the Pavilion 15-cw0003ng. However, the Ryzen 5 2500U thermal throttles so heavily that by the third benchmark loop the CB R15 scores have dropped around 10% behind our test device. The 15-cs0003ng does not get the most from its processor though, as demonstrated by our CB R15 graph. The ASUS VivoBook 15 X542UF and the Mi Notebook 15.6 outscore the 15-cs0003ng by 10% and 20% respectively. Both devices thermal throttle harder than our test device does, but they still maintain significantly higher CB R15 scores in our looped benchmark, which underlines the effectiveness of their cooling systems. 04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720Tooltip Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit 144 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit 505 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit 78.8 fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit 99.6 % Help The 15-cs0003ng scores well in system performance benchmarks such as PCMark 8 and 10 too. Our test device generally keeps pace with our Core i5-8250U powered comparison devices and performed well in both versions of PCMark thanks to its NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU. The 15-cs0003ng outscores its Ryzen 5 2500U powered sibling too, although the difference is not as clear cut as it is in Cinebench. PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Multimedia (4039 - 8670, n=81, last 2 years) 6522 Points +92% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 3609 Points +6% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 3418 Points 0% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 3402 Points Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (3175 - 3418, n=4) 3316 Points -3% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 3250 Points -4% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 3194 Points -6% EssentialsAverage of class Multimedia (8448 - 12420, n=81, last 2 years) 10396 Points +46% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 8110 Points +14% Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (7110 - 7589, n=4) 7312 Points +3% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 7140 Points 0% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 7110 Points Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 6926 Points -3% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 6191 Points -13% ProductivityAverage of class Multimedia (5462 - 11186, n=81, last 2 years) 8659 Points +73% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 5777 Points +15% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 5499 Points +10% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 5479 Points +9% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 5014 Points Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (4474 - 5499, n=4) 4991 Points 0% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 4581 Points -9% Digital Content CreationAverage of class Multimedia (3861 - 13548, n=81, last 2 years) 8494 Points +183% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 3000 Points Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 2808 Points -6% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 2790 Points -7% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 2748 Points -8% Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2560 - 3000, n=4) 2734 Points -9% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 2723 Points -9% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5514, n=9, last 2 years) 4992 Points +37% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 3695 Points +1% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 3675 Points +1% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 3647 Points Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 3621 Points -1% Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (3207 - 3903, n=5) 3583 Points -2% Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A 3461 Points -5% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 3404 Points -7% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 3153 Points -14% Work Score Accelerated v2Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=9, last 2 years) 5244 Points +10% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 4783 Points 0% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN 4779 Points 0% Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (4762 - 4779, n=4) 4771 Points 0% Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A 4769 Points 0% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF 4762 Points HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 4654 Points -2% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ 4544 Points -5% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 4467 Points -6% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3647 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4762 pointsPCMark 10 Score 3402 points Help The 15-cs0003ng achieves only average transfer speeds in CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD benchmarks. The SK Hynix SSD is noticeably slower than the drive in the Lenovo IdeaPad 330s-15IKB, but it is on par with those in our other comparison devices. Our test device feels snappy in daily use though. We did not encounter any prolonged loading times or stuttering during our tests. HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNFXiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQLenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210AAsus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBNAverage SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 -2% 3% -13% 3% -0% Write 4K 66.9 77.3 16% 71.8 7% 94.9 42% 71.3 (66.9 - 74.7, n=3) 7% Read 4K 30.33 29.77 -2% 21.23 -30% 27.3 -10% 25.3 (14.9 - 30.8, n=3) -17% Write Seq 447.6 442.5 -1% 158.1 -65% 257.1 -43% 410.4 -8% 473 (448 - 502, n=3) 6% Read Seq 534 442.7 -17% 892 67% 476.3 -11% 464 -13% 517 (499 - 534, n=3) -3% Write 4K Q32T1 197.5 173.8 -12% 162.2 -18% 202.6 3% 246.5 25% 209 (197.5 - 214, n=3) 6% Read 4K Q32T1 234.5 233.6 0% 320.4 37% 282 20% 246.4 5% 234 (226 - 241, n=3) 0% Write Seq Q32T1 495.6 510 3% 160.2 -68% 265.6 -46% 451.4 -9% 494 (482 - 505, n=3) 0% Read Seq Q32T1 559 530 -5% 933 67% 559 0% 532 -5% 552 (537 - 560, n=3) -1% AS SSD -2% -193% -30% -2% -3% Seq Read 522 489 -6% 95.9 -82% 487.3 -7% 493.7 -5% 499 (476 - 522, n=3) -4% Seq Write 476.1 458 -4% 78.9 -83% 250.6 -47% 420.1 -12% 474 (458 - 487, n=3) 0% 4K Read 30.14 30.24 0% 2.25 -93% 27.61 -8% 25.01 -17% 28.6 (25.1 - 30.6, n=3) -5% 4K Write 64.3 81.6 27% 54.9 -15% 72.1 12% 78.2 22% 60.7 (51.7 - 66.1, n=3) -6% 4K-64 Read 319.2 271.8 -15% 43.28 -86% 375.9 18% 236.4 -26% 298 (221 - 353, n=3) -7% 4K-64 Write 239.8 163 -32% 116.6 -51% 202.1 -16% 277.8 16% 233 (195.6 - 263, n=3) -3% Access Time Read * 0.131 0.092 30% 2.127 -1524% 0.08 39% 0.104 21% 0.1193 (0.092 - 0.135, n=3) 9% Access Time Write * 0.056 0.044 21% 0.045 20% 0.233 -316% 0.058 -4% 0.06033 (0.055 - 0.07, n=3) -8% Score Read 402 351 -13% 55 -86% 452 12% 311 -23% 376 (296 - 431, n=3) -6% Score Write 352 290 -18% 179 -49% 299 -15% 398 13% 341 (293 - 378, n=3) -3% Score Total 967 830 -14% 262 -73% 980 1% 873 -10% 918 (747 - 1040, n=3) -5% Copy ISO MB/s 253 287.4 514 Copy Program MB/s 108.8 155.4 259 Copy Game MB/s 154.4 245.8 521 Total Average (Program / Settings) -2% /-2% -95% /-124% -22% /-22% 1% /0% -2% /-2% * ... smaller is better Sequential Read: 509 MB/s Sequential Write: 485.6 MB/s 4K QD32 Write: 195.7 MB/s Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce MX130 handle graphics on the 15-cs0003ng. While the former is integrated in the Core i5-8250U and is only suitable for graphically undemanding programs, the latter has 2 GB of dedicated VRAM, which allows it to handle more GPU heavy programs. This allows even more demanding 3D applications run as well as older games on medium levels of graphics smoothly. It is worth keeping in mind that NVIDIA sells two versions of the GeForce MX130. The more powerful model is the one with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM, which is comparable to the GeForce 940MX. HP has equipped the 15-cs0003ng with the 2 GB version though, but many OEMs have done the same. Our test device achieves comparable 3DMark results to those of other GeForce MX130 equipped laptops that we have already tested. 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Multimedia (3408 - 60250, n=88, last 2 years) 18550 Points +541% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2895 Points Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2476 - 3203, n=14) 2872 Points -1% Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2786 Points -4% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2734 Points -6% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 2381 Points -18% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U 2140 Points -26% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U 1805 Points -38% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U 1666 Points -42% 3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (14679 - 150699, n=61, last 2 years) 57878 Points +325% Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (12166 - 14880, n=13) 13617 Points 0% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 13610 Points Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 13246 Points -3% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 12166 Points -11% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U 11314 Points -17% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 11226 Points -18% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U 10069 Points -26% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U 8567 Points -37% 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=88, last 2 years) 13697 Points +484% Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2149 - 2495, n=13) 2350 Points 0% HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2347 Points Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2311 Points -2% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 2291 Points -2% Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U 1722 Points -27% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 1715 Points -27% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U 557 Points -76% 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=88, last 2 years) 5132 Points Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (623 - 686, n=4) 650 Points Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U 623 Points 3DMark 11 Performance 3194 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 11187 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 2212 points Help The GeForce MX130 is powerful enough for some light gaming. The 15-cs003ng comfortably handles games such as "BioShock Infinite", "F1 2018" and "Thief "at 1,366x768 on low graphics, but framerates will drop severely if you increase the resolution to 1080p. Older games such as "BioShock Infinite" will remain playable at up to high graphics at 1,366x768 though. BioShock Infinite1366x768 Medium PresetHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 75.3 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (57.3 - 84.5, n=10) 72.9 fps -3% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 70.3 fps -7% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 34.2 fps -55% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 18.3 fps -76% 1366x768 High PresetHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 64.8 (23.7min) fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (48 - 69, n=10) 61.7 fps -5% Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 60.6 fps -6% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 29.9 fps -54% HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 15.7 fps -76% Thief1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4xHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 32.2 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 32.2 fps 0% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 15.1 fps -53% 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FXHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 37.1 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 37.1 fps 0% Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 15.2 fps -59% F1 20181920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8xHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 20 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 20 fps 0% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 12 fps -40% 1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:4xHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 26 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 26 fps 0% HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16 fps -38% The 15-cs0003ng operates quietly at idle. Our test device is never silent though because its HDD spins at around 32 dB(A). Removing the drive would make the device run even quieter. Predictably, the fan gets louder under sustained load, but it starts emitting an uncomfortable whirring sound when the device is pushed hard. The fan noise is particularly intrusive in quiet rooms, so we would advise operating with caution if you to perform computationally intensive tasks in noise-sensitive environments. Noise Level Idle 30.6 / 30.6 / 32.1 dB(A) HDD 32 dB(A)Load 43.2 / 43.4 dB(A) 30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud min: dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.4353331.835.42531.933.133.130.731.93135.83533.732.935.84030.832.62930.230.85031.132.330.23031.16327.828.528.427.827.8803031.428.227.4301002828.72926.52812525.526.225.825.825.51602525.324.525.32520023.323.422.922.723.325022.523.622.122.722.531524.925.721.72224.940024.124.921.92124.15002424.720.520.12463027.227.419.419.827.280027.527.420.418.927.5100029.230.121.218.329.2125029.930.720.41829.9160030.430.221.518.130.4200032.432.720.217.932.4250034.734.919.818.134.7315036.836.819.418.136.8400029.930.119.218.329.9500028.929.319.118.428.963003029.918.918.630800024.424.718.818.824.41000022.422.218.818.822.41250021.62118.818.621.61600020.420.118.818.720.4SPL43.343.432.130.943.3N3.83.91.51.33.8median 27.2median 27.4median 20.4median 18.8median 27.2Delta33.11.91.9335.23330.530.735.23732.432.533.837403331.534.54033.930.730.829.833.937.436.335.329.337.428.627.429.126.328.62726.727.326.92726.826.624.925.926.826.725.424.324.626.726.325.823.124.126.325.725.122.222.725.726.825.822.121.326.829.62822.520.529.628.327.220.820.828.326.725.619.919.326.725.224.919.218.425.225.624.818.91825.627.626.419.117.327.626.625.918.817.126.62928.119.217.22928.327.318.917.228.32927.919.517.12927.626.417.917.327.628.126.617.817.528.12624.517.917.62623.622.717.817.823.620.6201817.820.619.218.918.117.719.218.318.31817.618.318.618.51817.818.6393830.9303932.71.31.23median 26.7median 25.8median 19.1median 17.8median 26.72.62.62.11.72.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ngAsus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T The 15-cs0003ng operates coolly at idle, with surface temperatures only reaching a maximum of 24.6 °C (~76 °F). The palm rest stays below 30 °C (~86 °F) under sustained load too, which ensures comfortable use even when the device is being pushed hard. However, surface temperatures reach 49 °C (~120 °F) on the underside of the device, which will feel hot if you are using it on your lap while gaming, for example. Hence, we would recommend placing the device on a table if you are stressing the system. We also subjected the 15-cs0003ng to a stress test to determine whether the system thermal throttles. CPU core temperatures briefly exceed 60 °C (~140 °F) during a combined FurMark and Prime95 stress test, but the CPU then downclocks to 1.9-2.0 GHz to cool itself. The core clock throttling helps cores temperatures drop to around 55 °C (~131 °F). Hence, the CPU only operates at its maximum potential for the first 15-30 seconds of our hour-long stress test. This behaviour is less dramatic than it seems at first glance though since it only occurs when the CPU and GPU are both stressed simultaneously. By contrast, our test device maintained almost peak performance during our Cinebench R15 multi-core looped benchmark. We have included screenshots below of our FurMark and Prime95 stress tests to give you a greater overview of clock speeds and core temperatures. Please keep in mind that up until 8 minutes in only Prime95 is stressing the CPU. The CPU briefly operates at 3.4 GHz, before quickly dropping to 1.95 GHz. After 8 minutes we started running FurMark, which caused the GPU core temperatures to reach 82 °C (~180 °F). The dGPU consistently maintained a 1,050 MHz clock speed throughout our stress tests. 40.4 °C 105 F48 °C 118 F36.6 °C 98 F 38.6 °C 101 F44.1 °C 111 F30.4 °C 87 F 28.2 °C 83 F27 °C 81 F27.5 °C 82 F Maximum: 48 °C = 118 F Average: 35.4 °C = 96 F 37.6 °C 100 F49 °C 120 F39 °C 102 F29.2 °C 85 F40.7 °C 105 F37.5 °C 100 F27 °C 81 F27.4 °C 81 F274 °C 525 F Maximum: 49 °C = 120 F Average: 35 °C = 95 F Power Supply (max.) 49.1 °C = 120 F | Room Temperature 23.1 °C = 74 F | FIRT 550-Pocket (±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia. (-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia. (-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F. (+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.6 °C / 1 F). The Pavilion 15 has surprisingly decent speakers. The sound produced is balanced and can get comparatively loud. The sound spectrum is relatively even too, which make the speakers good enough for listening to music or watching videos for prolonged periods. You could connect external speakers or headphones via Bluetooth or the headphone jack if you prefer. dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.631.831.62532.130.732.13130.832.930.84030.330.230.35030.33030.36329.827.829.8802827.42810027.326.527.312525.925.825.916029.925.329.920035.822.735.825046.422.746.431557225740067.72167.750067.320.167.363067.619.867.68006118.961100066.818.366.8125068.11868.1160067.118.167.1200068.417.968.4250067.618.167.631507118.171400070.318.370.3500069.318.469.3630067.318.667.3800063.318.863.31000065.418.865.41250065.418.665.41600059.918.759.9SPL8030.980N45.31.345.3median 66.8median 18.8median 66.8Delta8.71.98.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 15-cs0003ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices) HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median (±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median (+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median) Compared to same class » 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse » The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45% Compared to all devices tested » 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median (+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median (+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse » The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% The 15-cs0003ng is a comparatively energy efficient laptop. Our test device consumes a minimum of 3.3 W at idle, which is on par with the best of our comparison devices, and a maximum of 67 W under load. The device averages 56 W under load too, which may initially look alarming. However, the 15-cs0003ng has a more powerful GPU than most of our comparison devices and is on par with the VivoBook 15 X542UF, which also has a GeForce MX130 GPU. HP includes a 65-W charger, which will be overwhelmed by the 15-cs0003ng when the system is pushed hard. This should not be a problem in daily use, but it is something worth keeping in mind if you are looking for a device on which you can also do some light gaming. HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, LED, 1920x1080, 15.60Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Average of class Multimedia Power Consumption 1% -15% 4% 5% -7% 3% -11% -83% Idle Minimum * 3.3 4.5 -36% 5.6 -70% 5 -52% 3.3 -0% 4.75 -44% 5.6 -70% 4.54 (3.12 - 7.5, n=13) -38% 7.48 (2.2 - 34.6, n=93, last 2 years) -127% Idle Average * 6.1 7.3 -20% 8.6 -41% 7.6 -25% 5.6 8% 6.9 -13% 7.1 -16% 6.98 (5.3 - 9.7, n=13) -14% 11.9 (4.6 - 43, n=93, last 2 years) -95% Idle Maximum * 8.3 9.4 -13% 8.7 -5% 8.6 -4% 7.8 6% 7 16% 7.9 5% 9.08 (7 - 13, n=13) -9% 14.8 (5.6 - 44.9, n=93, last 2 years) -78% Load Average * 56 34 39% 39.9 29% 25.6 54% 54 4% 53 5% 32.8 41% 54.1 (34 - 74.3, n=13) 3% 77.1 (14.3 - 147, n=92, last 2 years) -38% Load Maximum * 67 41.9 37% 59.9 11% 34 49% 63 6% 65.3 3% 30.5 54% 66.4 (40.5 - 106.6, n=13) 1% 119.2 (44 - 247, n=92, last 2 years) -78% Witcher 3 ultra * 33.2 * ... smaller is better The 15-cs0003ng has a 41 Wh battery, which has poor runtimes. Our test device lasted just 4:44 hours in our practical Wi-Fi test, during which we set the screen to approximately 150 cd/m² and run a script that simulates the load required to render websites. This runtime puts the 15-cs0003ng bottom of our comparison table and 11 minutes behind the Ryzen 5 2500U equipped Pavilion 15. In short, our test device has worse battery life than all our comparison devices and has around 4% shorter runtimes than the 15-cw0003ng. Likewise, the 15-cs0003ng also has 35% worse battery life than the 15-cs0053cl. Battery Runtime Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)8h 13minWiFi Websurfing4h 44minLoad (maximum brightness)2h 01min HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 41 WhHP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 41 WhXiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, 40 WhLenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 WhAcer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 WhAsus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 38 WhHP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery Runtime 4% 22% 23% 38% 43% 35% 53% Reader / Idle 493 504 2% 613 24% 754 53% 722 46% 901 (458 - 1571, n=27, last 2 years) 83% WiFi v1.3 284 302 6% 340 20% 350 23% 505 78% 407 43% 419 48% 554 (262 - 1204, n=92, last 2 years) 95% Load 121 126 4% 113 -7% 118 -2% 134 11% 97.2 (39 - 215, n=74, last 2 years) -20% Pros
Cons- high power consumption - short battery life - unpleasant fan noise under load The HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng has a modern design and an almost bezel-less display. Moreover, the Intel Core i5-8250U processor and NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU is a powerful combination that will breeze through general office tasks and even some games at the right graphics settings. The HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng is a well-rounded 15.6-inch laptop that has a great design and enough power for most tasks. However, it has comparatively short battery life and a noisy fan under load, which may put off some potential buyers. Unfortunately, the NVIDIA GPU has a significant impact on battery life, with the practically identically equipped Pavilion 15-cs0053cl achieving twice as long runtimes in our tests as the 15-cs0003ng. Disabling the NVIDIA GPU in Device Manager would help improve battery life though. Overall, the Pavilion 15-cs0003ng is a great 15.6-inch laptop that falls short of the competition in a few areas. HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng- 01/10/2019 v6(old) Mike Wobker Pointing Device 88 / 20-67 → 100% Games Performance 70 / 95 → 74% Application Performance 87% Multimedia - Weighted Average PricecompareEditor of the original article: Mike Faust - Senior Tech Writer - 424 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017 I carried out my first IT experiments with a 386-based system and a whole 4 MB RAM. This was followed by work on various PCs and laptops that I maintained and repaired for friends and acquaintances. After training to become a Telecommunications Systems Technician and gaining a few years of experience, I graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Currently, I pursue my fascination for IT, technology, and mobile devices by writing reviews and articles for Notebookcheck. I have also worked for Gamestar, Netzwelt, and Golem, among others. Translator: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9378 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018 Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat. Is Intel Core i5While other processors from Intel, such as the i3-8145U, are popular for their features and impressive memory capacities, the Intel Core i5-8265U is loaded with power that ensures the CPU can perform better and oftentimes faster. Is the HP 15s a good laptop?I am very impressed with the speakers that are loud and clear and colours on the screen. I wish I could say more. Happy to recommend this laptop to those who are looking for a new computer. Rated 4 out of 5 by Claire from Laptop This far everything is working as expected with service and delivery having been great. How old is i5The Intel Core i5-8265U is a mobile processor with 4 cores, launched in October 2018. Is hp15 a good laptop?Good value , performance and quality product Good labtop for the price, windows 11, processor speed is moderate. Touchscreen is easy to use. Battery life is good . Graphics are better than describe, it's moderate. |
