Đánh giá samsung 850 evo oem năm 2024

Bạn đang tìm kiếm một số thông tin liên quan đến sản phẩm SSD Samsung 850 evo 250gb M2 2280. Hãy cùng theo dõi bài viết này để hiểu hơn về sản phẩm.

Đánh giá samsung 850 evo oem năm 2024
SSD Samsung 850 evo 250gb M2 2280

Hãy tham khảo qua một số thông số của sản phẩm:

Dung lượng 250GB Tốc độ đọc tuần tự 540 MB/s Tốc độ ghi tuần tự 520 MB/s Chuẩn giao tiếp M.2 2280 TBW 75 TB Bảo hành 36 Tháng Phần mềm chuyển HĐH Samsung Data Migration

Cũng như mọi dòng ổ cứng SSD samsung 850 evo khác dòng ổ cứng SSD Samsung 850 evo 250gb m2 2280 cũng có đẩy đủ các tính năng hỗ trợ ổ cứng như: 3D VNAND TLC, TurboWrite, Rapid Mode, Dynamic Thermal Guard,…

Việc áp dụng những kỹ thuật tiên tiến vào ổ cứng SSD đã giúp cho dòng ổ cứng SSD samsung 850 evo có chỗ đứng vững trên thị trường. Nhờ có công nghệ TurboWrite giúp ổ cứng có tốc độ đọc ghi lên đến 540MB/s và 520MB/s. Công nghệ Dynamic Thermal Guard giúp ổ cứng tiết kiệm được điện năng. Công nghệ Rapid Mode sử dụng bộ nhớ đệm của RAM để tăng hiệu suất….

Nhờ những công nghệ tiên tiến mà dòng SSD Samsung 850 evo 250gb M2 2280 là giả phẩm được đánh giá tích cực từ những chuyên gia công nghệ hàng đầu thế giới. Đây là dòng sản phẩm nằm trong phân khúc phổ thông và được nhiều người ưa chuộng. Thời gian bảo hành sản phẩm lên đến 36 tháng, do vậy người dùng hãy yên tâm hơn về sản phẩm.

  1. Trang chủ
  2. Ổ cứng
  3. SSD
  4. Samsung
  5. Ổ cứng SSD 1TB Samsung PM871a 2.5-Inch SATA III (OEM 850 EVO)

Đánh giá samsung 850 evo oem năm 2024

Thông số kỹ thuật

Thương hiệu:Ổ cứng SSD 2.5-Inch SamsungModel:MZ7LN1T0HMJPBảo hành:3 nămDung lượng:1 TBĐọc/Ghi ngẫu nhiên:97/88K IOPSĐọc tuần tự:530 MB/sGhi tuần tự:515 MB/s (526 MB/s với TurboWrite)NAND Flash:TLC 3D V-NANDController:Samsung MaiaChuẩn:Sata III 6Gbit/s, 2.5 Inch, 6.8mm

Đánh giá, bình luận về SSD 1TB Samsung PM871a

Bạn hãy là người đầu tiên đánh giá sản phẩm này: Tuyệt vời quá

Ổ cứng SSD 2.5-Inch khác

The 850 EVO is yet another showcase of Samsung's engineering talent and truth to be told there is a lot of good in the 850 EVO. By combining TLC with V-NAND technology, Samsung is eliminating any and all concerns that people might have had about the endurance of TLC NAND and to back that up Samsung is rating the 850 EVO's endurance higher than the MLC drives of most manufacturers. I never considered the endurance of TLC NAND to be an issue for average client workloads, but I saw many people who were doubtful about the sufficiency of 1,000 P/E cycles, so with twice that in TLC V-NAND I believe many will and should stop treating TLC as a second class citizen.

Not only is the endurance higher, but the 850 EVO's performance is also better compared to its predecessor. In our 2011 Storage Benches the 850 EVO matches up with the 850 Pro and is hence one of the fastest SATA 6Gbps SSDs for typical client workloads. In very heavy workloads, illustrated by our 2013 Storage Bench, the 850 EVO does okay, but it's clear that it's outperformed by drives that are more optimized for such usage.

NewEgg Price Comparison (12/7/2014) 120/128GB 240/250/256GB 480/500/512GB 960GB/1TB Samsung SSD 850 EVO (MSRP) $100 $150 $270 $500 Samsung SSD 850 Pro $105 $180 $320 $630 Samsung SSD 840 EVO $85 $125 $230 $440 SanDisk Extreme Pro - $150 $328 $531 SanDisk Ultra II $80 $110 $220 $420 Crucial MX100 $70 $113 $215 - Crucial M550 $85 $163 $265 $450 Plextor M6S $80 $158 $290 - Intel SSD 730 - $130 $220 - Intel SSD 530 $75 $130 $240 - OCZ ARC 100 $70 $100 $215 -

There is one huge 'but' however – the price. The 850 EVO is a very competitive drive in performance and features, but neither of these warrants the premium Samsung is charging. As I've said before, there are only two main segments in the SSD market that I recognize, which are the value/mainstream and high-end/enthusiast segments.

For the value segment, the key consideration is the price because these are typically users who don't push their systems to the limits and thus shouldn't pay a premium for a performance increase that is likely to be negligible for their usage. Our Light Workload suite highlights this pretty well because the difference between most drives is on the order of 10-20% and while a possible 10% increase in performance would be worth $5, $10 and maybe even $20 to some users, it's definitely not worth the ~$50 Samsung is charging for the 850 EVO over Crucial's MX100 and SanDisk's Ultra II for example.

As for the high-end segment, Samsung already has that one covered by the 850 Pro. The 850 EVO, especially at the smaller capacities, isn't fast enough under IO intensive workloads to really compete with the 850 Pro and Extreme Pro. Given that the Extreme Pro can be had for about the same cost (depending on the capacity, of course), I would much rather have that if I was looking for a high-end SSD.

In other words, the 850 EVO falls into the infamous middle-class. It doesn't have an obvious niche in the market because it's too expensive for the value-oriented buyer and it's not fast enough to be considered as a competitive high-end SSD. If Samsung shaved $30 to $50 off the price, the 850 EVO would be competitive against the other value drives because the five-year warranty and Samsung's top-of-the-class software suite add some value, but with the current pricing there are just better options on the market.

A part of me sees that it might have been worthwhile for Samsung to do one more planar NAND shrink to be more competitive in the mainstream segment because right now the 850 EVO is missing that market. While 3D NAND will eventually become more cost efficient as the number of layers increases, we are not there yet. I absolutely love all the performance and endurance benefits V-NAND is bringing to the table, but if the 850 EVO can't even compete with MLC drives in price, that's a bit alarming.

There is still hope that the MSRPs are just conservative and street prices could end up lower. If they don't, while the 850 EVO is clearly the best performing "value" drive, it likely won't see the same sort of success as its predecessor. Samsung also has a strong presence in the OEM desktop and laptop markets, but OEMs may not see enough to sway them over from the 840 EVO if prices are quite a bit higher.