What is the most accurate statement regarding the relationship between having money and experiencing happiness?

  1. Adler NE, Rehkopf DH. US disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:235–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allin P, Hand DJ. New statistics for old?—measuring the wellbeing of the UK. J Royal Stat Soc Ser A. 2017;180(1):3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arechavala NS, Espina PZ, Trapero BP. The economic crisis and its effects on the quality of life in the European Union. Soc Indic Res. 2015;120(2):323–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas-Diener R, Vittersø J, Diener E. The Danish effect: beginning to explain high well-being in Denmark. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97(2):229–46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ. Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(8):1733–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carreira H, Williams R, Strongman H, Bhaskaran K. Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e029227.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen C, Goldman DP, Zissimopoulos J, Rowe JW. Multidimensional comparison of countries’ adaptation to societal aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(37):9169–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cieciuch J, Davidov E, Schmidt P, Algesheimer R, Schwartz SH. Comparing results of exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: a cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values. Front Psychol. 2014;8(5):982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deaton A. Income, health and wellbeing around the world: evidence from the Gallup world poll. J Econ Perspect. 2008;22(2):53–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Diener E. New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. Am Psychol. 2012;67(8):590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New measures of well-being: flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2009;39:247–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diener E, Seligman ME. Beyond money toward an economy of well-being. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004;5(1):1–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diener E, Pressman S, Hunter J, Chase D. If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2017;9(2):133–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolan P, White MP. How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2(1):71–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eastbrook R, Neale M. A comparison of factor score estimation methods in presence of missing data: reliability and an application to nicotine dependence. Multivar Behav Res. 2012;48(1):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eid M, Krumm S, Koch T, Schulze J. Bifactor models for predicting criteria by general and specific factors: problems of Nonidentiability and alternative solutions. Journal of Intelligence. 2018;6(3):42.

  17. European Social Survey (2014). Weighting European Social Survey Data. Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/ESS_weighting_data_1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farver-Vestergaard I, Ruggeri K. Setting National Policy Agendas in Light of the Denmark Results for Well-being. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(8):773–4.

  19. Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. A note on improving EAP trait estimation in oblique factor-analytic and item response theory models. Psicologica. 2016;37(2):235–47.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerstorf D, Hoppmann CA, Löckenhoff CE, Infurna FJ, Schupp J, Wagner GG, Ram N. Terminal decline in well-being: the role of social orientation. Psychol Aging. 2016;31(2):149.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Grundke, R., et al. Skills and global value chains: A characterisation, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2017/05, OECD Publishing. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/cdb5de9b-en.

  22. Gudmundsdottir DG. The impact of economic crisis on happiness. Soc Indic Res. 2013;110(3):1083–101.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences†. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2009;1(2):137–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huppert FA. The state of well-being science: concepts, measures, interventions and policies. In: Huppert FA, Cooper CL, editors. Interventions and policies to enhance well-being. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huppert FA, Marks N, Clark A, Siegrist J, Stutzer A, Vitterso J, Wahrendorf M. Measuring well-being across Europe: description of the ESS well-being module and preliminary findings. Soc Indic Res. 2009;91(3):301–15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huppert F, Ruggeri K. 15. Policy challenges: well-being as a priority in public mental health. In: Bhugra D, Bhui K, Wong S, Gilman S, editors. Oxford textbook of public mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

  27. Huppert FA, So TT. Flourishing across Europe: application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Soc Indic Res. 2013;110(3):837–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huppert FA, Whittington JE. Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: implications for quality of life assessment. Br J Health Psychol. 2003;8(1):107–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahneman D, Krueger AB. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect. 2006;20(1):3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Knapp M, McDaid D, Parsonage M. Mental health promotion and mental illness prevention: the economic case. London: London School of Economics; 2011.

  31. Lihavainen K, Sipilä S, Rantanen T, Kauppinen M, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S. Effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment and targeted intervention on mobility in persons aged 75 years and over: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(4):314–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2019). Sum Scores Are Factor Scores. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3wy47.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nicolaisen M, Thorsen K. Who are lonely? Loneliness in different age groups (18–81 years old), using two measures of loneliness. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014;78(3):229–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Boylaud, O. Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 226, OECD publishing, Paris. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1787/215182844604.

  35. Oberski D. Lavaan.Survey: an R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models. J Stat Softw. 2014;57(1):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. OECD. Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Portugal. Retrieved on January 28, 2016 at http://bit.ly/2wqZweh. 2014.

  37. Oishi S, Diener E, Lucas RE. The optimum level of well-being: can people be too happy? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2(4):346–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reibling N, Beckfield J, Huijts T, Schmidt-Catran A, Thomson KH, Wendt C. Depressed during the depression: has the economic crisis affected mental health inequalities in Europe? Findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the determinants of health. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27:47–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Richards M, Huppert FA. Do positive children become positive adults? Evidence from a longitudinal birth cohort study. J Posit Psychol. 2011;6(1):75–87.

  40. Roseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ruggeri K, Garcia Garzon E, Maguire Á, Huppert F. Chapter 1: comprehensive psychological well-being. In: Looking through the wellbeing kaleidoscope: Results from the European Social Survey. London: New Economics Foundation; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Steptoe A, Deaton A, Stone AA. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):640–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(15):5797–801.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. World Health Organization. The world health report 2001: mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

  46. Young C. Losing a job: the nonpecuniary cost of unemployment in the United States. Soc Forces. 2012;91(2):609–6.

    Google Scholar 


Page 2

  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Press center
  • Support and Contact
  • Leave feedback
  • Careers

Follow BMC

  • BMC Twitter page
  • BMC Facebook page
  • BMC Weibo page