FEAR AROUSAL AND PERSUASION
Psychology
- 1975
This study was designed to re-examine the validity of the defensive avoidance hypothesis in the study of fear-arousing communications.In the present study, three independent variables were used-that…
Fear appeals and persuasion: the differentiation of a motivational construct.
- H. Leventhal
Psychology
American journal of public health
- 1971
To convince you that nothing is so practical as a good theory, I shall review two sets of ideas that can be used to understand the persuasive effects of fear-arousing health messages, discuss how well these ideas fit empirical data, and leave you to decide which provides the most creative suggestions for practical action.
Motivation and the communication processes
- F. Mcdonald
Psychology
- 1961
THE ASSUMPTION THAT HUMAN BEHAVIOR is "motivated" is common. Workers in such diverse fields as education, advertising, and politics stress the importance of analyzing men's motives and the value of…
- Entry
- Reader's guide
- Entries A-Z
- Subject index
Fear Appeals
Definition
Fear appeals, or fear-arousing communications, are communications that emphasize negative consequences of specific behaviors to motivate behavior change. Fear-arousing communications usually consist of two parts, namely, a fear appeal that stresses the severity of, and personal vulnerability to, a threat and a recommended protective action capable of reducing or eliminating the threat.
Context and Importance
Fear appeals are widely used in health promotion. They come in many guises, from the obligatory health warnings on cigarette packs to essays about the deleterious effects of obesity. With an estimated 40% of premature mortality from the 10 leading causes of death in the United States due to modifiable lifestyle factors, the use of fear appeals in health promotion has become an accepted means of improving the health of populations. The ...
locked icon
Sign in to access this content
Sign in
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
Read modern, diverse business cases
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
sign up today!
Authors
- William Allen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, W. Effects of fear-arousing communications. ETR&D 1, 222 [1953]. //doi.org/10.1007/BF02713264
Download citation
Published: 16 August 2021
Issue Date: June 1953
DOI: //doi.org/10.1007/BF02713264
Keywords
- Tooth Decay
- Hygiene Practice
- Mass Communication
- Dental Hygiene
- Explanatory Hypothesis
References
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. [1980].Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Google Scholar
Edwards, W. [1961]. Behavioral decision theory.Annu. Rev. Psychol. 12: 473–498.
PubMed Google Scholar
Eiser, J. R., van der Pligt, J., Raw, M., and Sutton, S. R. [1985]. Trying to stop smoking: Effects of perceived addiction, attributions for failure, and expectancy of success.J. Behav. Med. 8: 321–341.
PubMed Google Scholar
Hallett, R., and Sutton, S. R. [1986]. Factors influencing the decision to attempt to stop smoking in a media-based smoking intervention programme.Health Educ. Res. 1: 163–173.
Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H. [1953].Communication and Persuasion, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. [1967]. Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and research. In Berkowitz, L. [ed.],Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 166–224.
Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. [1979].Correlation and Causality, Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar
Leventhal, H. [1970]. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Berkowitz, L. [ed.],Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 119–186.
Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. [1968]. Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In Borgatta, E., and Lambert, W. [eds.],Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 1130–1188.
Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. [1975]. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change.J. Psychol. 91: 93–114.
Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. [1983]. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., and Shapiro, D. [eds.],Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 153–176.
Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. [1985]. Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals.Psychol. Rep. 56: 179–182.
Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W., and Mewborn, C. R. [1976]. Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34: 54–61.
Google Scholar
Sutton, S. R. [1979]. Can subjective expected utility [SEU] theory explain smokers' decisions to try to stop smoking? In Oborne, D. J., Gruneberg, M. M., and Eiser, J. R. [eds.],Research in Psychology and Medicine, Academic Press, London, Vol. 2, pp. 94–101.
Google Scholar
Sutton, S. R. [1982]. Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In Eiser, J. R. [ed.],Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 303–337.
Google Scholar
Sutton, S. R., and Eiser, J. R. [1984]. The effect of fear-arousing communications on cigarette smoking: An expectancy-value approach.J. Behav. Med. 7: 13–33.
PubMed Google Scholar
-
Sutton, S. R., Marsh, A., and Matheson, J. [1987]. Explaining smokers' decisions to stop: Test of an expectancy-value approach.Soc. Behav. 2: 35–49.
Google Scholar
Download references